One flat subscription for your team, monthly, with a yearly option, and you can cancel any time. No tiers to work through and no usage bill to watch. You will see the current price when you sign up, before anything is charged.

Your AI agent runs the simulations, you make the calls

Q: Do I have to learn to program?

No. If you would rather never look at code, you never have to. What you need is to read a result and say whether it looks plausible, which you can already do. The examples all ship with the script they ran, so anyone on your team who does want to look can.

Q: We already have an AI tool in the company and nobody uses it. Will this be the same?

That is the most common situation we see, and the fix is not more tooling. It is one guided success on a real part, a set of sentences worth typing, and someone to compare notes with. That is what the four moments above and the community sessions are for.

Q: How is a fast AI answer trustworthy?

On its own it is a fast screening answer, and we suggest treating it as one. Explore with the fast engine, then confirm on the numerical solver, validated for more than 35 years, before anyone commits money. That loop is the point of having both.

Q: Can it do warpage, or fiber-reinforced material?

The numerical engine can, today. The fast AI engine covers filling on thermoplastics and nothing else yet, and runners, cooling and warpage are on the way for it. We would rather you knew that now than found out on your own part.

Q: What if it gives me a wrong answer?

It will, at some point, and the two piles above are how you catch it. Ask for the output behind every claim, start with questions you can check by hand, and write each correction down once so it holds in every session after. A tool you can audit beats a tool that is never wrong, because the second one does not exist.

Q: Who owns what it produces?

Your geometry and your results are yours and stay on your machine unless you upload them, over your own account. What the agent writes for you is yours. The question of what the model vendor keeps is answered on their side, and it depends on the plan you are on, which is worth checking once with IT.

One subscription, up to three people · Monthly, cancel any time · First example needs no account

Faster decisions

A gate question gets answered while the meeting is still running. Up to 1,000x faster than classical solvers, for filling analysis.
Explore before it is expensive

Explore a hundred layouts while the design can still change. The limit is what you think to try.
Answers you can defend

Confirm the results on the numerical solver, validated for more than 35 years. Under 5% error on most filling cases.
No AI experience needed

Your engineers set the goal and judge the result. The agent does the setup and the runs in between.

What an answer looks like

Real part, real result

Here is the finished result of the conversation at the top of the page. The agent ran 17 filling simulations and compared layouts with one and two gates.
It recommends a single gate on the back of the left wall, near the connector.

The part fills evenly and the weld lines end up in hidden areas. A second gate would have added tooling and runner cost without a clear gain in quality.

Drag the part to turn it, switch between filling pressure, melt temperature, and fill progress, and play back the filling from the gate.

A chatbot

Describes what you could do
You copy things out and run them
Forgets between conversations
One answer at a time

An agent

Does it, then shows you
It runs them and reads the result
Reads your notes every session
Hundreds of runs while you do something else

You describe the decision
- In plain language, the way you would brief a colleague.
- Which part, what has to hold, what you are willing to trade away.
It runs the simulations
- It works out the candidates, runs them, reads the results and scores them against what you said mattered.
- Hundreds of runs is a normal afternoon.
You judge the answer
- The recommendation arrives with the runs behind it, so you can check the reasoning and say yes or no.
- That judgment stays yours.

Your week

Four questions you already deal with, and the sentence to type for each

Having the tool is not the same as using it, and this is the part that usually gets skipped. Here are four, with the actual words. Each one is a single sentence. Copy one and start there.

A result lands on your desk Work out what a result is actually telling you

A finished simulation, and the question is where the trouble is. Start here, because you can check the answer yourself in a minute.

Type this

Open the result in this folder. Tell me which region fills last and what the peak cavity pressure is, and show me the output you based that on.

It only reads and reports. Nothing is changed, and you already know what a plausible answer looks like.

An inquiry needs a number Quote a part in the half hour after the inquiry lands

Cycle time, cavity count and cost per part usually come from experience plus a margin. The arithmetic can be done properly instead.

The sentence will be

Work out cycle time and a cavity count for this part on the machines we have, and give me a cost per part with the assumptions listed.

On the shortlist, not built yet. Tell us how you quote today and it shapes the example.

Before the design review Settle how many gates, and where

The question everyone has an opinion about. Answer it with a scored table instead of experience alone.

Type this

Try one to four gates on this part and rank the layouts on filling pressure and fill evenness. Keep the weld line off the face the customer sees, and tell me why each one scored where it did.

Every candidate comes back with the run behind it, so the recommendation is arguable in the room.

The machine trial is booked Walk in with real bounds instead of a best guess

You want the window the part still fills in, and to know which limit bites first.

Type this

Sweep the process settings on this part and give me the range where it still fills. Tell me which limit we hit first, and write it up as a short spec I can take to the trial.

A sweep of this size finished in about 86 minutes in our own run, and it can be picked up again if it stops.

Where does our data go?

The files the agent reads are sent to the model vendor to answer the request. Sent is not the same as trained on. Business and enterprise plans exclude your content from training by default, and the vendor states how long it is kept. Check which plan you are on.

Your geometry and your results stay on your machine unless the agent uploads them to the platform, and it does that over your own account.

Can it delete or change things?

It can write files in the folder you start it in, and nowhere else. Start in a fresh, empty project folder, keep it off network drives, and approve each command one at a time until you trust the pattern.

You approve every step. Nothing runs behind your back.

What does it need installed?

Tell us which AI agent your team uses and we will tell you how we can work with it.

It needs Python. Nobody on your team has to open Python: it is what the agent runs on. It installs like any other desktop tool, with no admin rights beyond what Python already needs. There are two logins, one for the platform and one for the toolkit itself, and both are set up for you the first time.

Want to see it on your own work? Request access, and our team will get back to you to set it up together.

Get early access

Checking the work

How you know the answer is right

The agent can check the mechanical things: whether a run finished, or whether one option came out better than another on a measure you set.

You check the rest: whether it was the right measure, whether it used the right revision of the part, and whether the result is physically plausible. That judgment is most of the skill, and it stays with you.

What the AI Solver covers today, compared with the numerical solver

hundreds of filling variants at once

The AI Solver

Filling, thermoplastics
Up to 1,000x faster than classical solvers
Full 3D fill results in seconds
Under 5% error on most filling cases
On the roadmap: runner systems, cooling systems, warpage

full-fidelity verification

Numerical Solver

Filling, packing, warpage
Thermoplastics, fiber-reinforced materials, elastomers, RIM materials
Inserts, foaming
Three thermal modes, up to full 3D thermal analysis
Consistent with the production simulation tools you already know
Verify with confidence before tooling

For the person who has to approve it

What you are actually authorizing

This is one subscription, one team, and one new habit. The measurable change is time. A gate question that used to wait for an afternoon of setup gets answered while the meeting is still running, and a sweep that would have taken two weeks of somebody's calendar finished in 86 minutes in our own run.

You see it work first

The first example runs offline on a laptop, without an account or a license, so your engineer can show you a result before you approve anything.
One subscription, up to three people

Monthly, cancel any time. All three seats are included in the price, so the engineer running the agent, a reviewer and one more colleague can work in the same project from day one.
Your existing engineers do the work

The same engineers answer more questions in the same week. The work that used to queue behind one simulation expert stops queuing.
Decisions arrive with their evidence

Every recommendation carries the runs behind it, which is what makes it defensible to a customer, an auditor or a tool shop.

Get early access

Agentic molding is only a few months old. The teams in early access are working out today how agents fit their engineering, with a direct line to our product team. Tell us what your agent should take off your engineers’ plates, and we’ll get you started.

What happens when you apply

You tell us what you'd like the agent to do.
We set up a call and show you an agent at work on a real example.
Your team starts, up to three people, and we’re on hand while you build your first workflows.

Firefly Isometric 3D illustration of a plastic injection molding fill simulation.

Frequently asked questions

I have never used any of this. Am I too far behind?

No. Three of the four teams that joined first arrived without using AI tooling at all, and one had a tool sitting in the building that nobody had tried. That is the normal starting point, not the exception, and it is why this page exists at all. The whole technology is a few months old, so nobody is years ahead of you.

Do I have to learn to program?

We already have an AI tool in the company and nobody uses it. Will this be the same?

How is a fast AI answer trustworthy?

What does it cost?

Can it do warpage, or fiber reinforced material?

What if it gives me a wrong answer?

Who owns what it produces?

Still have questions?

We're happy to help. Reach out to our Product team directly and we'll get back to you.

ai.solver@simcon.ai

Your AI agent runs the simulations, you make the calls

Real part, real result